The Personalist Project

Blocked? Me? Or, My Journey from Righteous Indignation to a Modicum of Self-Awareness

I've lived a sheltered cyber-life: I was never even blocked from a Facebook group--until last Friday. It was surprisingly enlightening.

I'd joined a large, exceedingly useful and friendly diabetes support group. We were just about to get a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) for my daughter, and this group specialized in that particular experience--even our particular brand. The members were invaluable for heading off crises and glitches. Or rejoicing with you when the number on your meter matched the one on your CGM.  Or commiserating with true compassion when your negotiations with the pharmaceutical-insurance-industrial complex broke down. Or sharing your consternation about that lady who swears her brother-in-law's cousin used to have type 1 diabetes but was cured by oil of oregano and cider vinegar.

I was feeling especially grateful for the existence of my virtual community. I was starting to imagine I knew these fellow travelers personally--all 11,000 of them.

And that's when I made my mistake. I shared a post I'd written for Aleteia about remembering the person behind the glucose number, even though (as I noticed only later) they'd stated clearly that both people and posts that violated their guidelines could be deleted without notice. Two of those guidelines, which I'd skimmed over, were "no hot-button topics" and "no self-promotion."

I posted the piece and was immediately blocked.

And here are a few things I learned: 

I'm having a friend plead my case, and if that doesn't work out, there are other, similar groups. It's just a first-world problem. But it's also a bracing reminder that personal interaction in cyberspace isn't always what it seems.


Comments (2)

Katie van Schaijik

Aug 19, 2016 8:37am

Oh, ugh. What an unpleasant experience!

That category of "self-promotion" is an interesting one, isn't it? It's taken (I suppose it can't be otherwise, under the cyber circumstances) to be entirely objective. You wrote the article, therefore your linking it is self-promotion.

No distinction is made between those who promote something for the sake of the help it might give others and those who promote something to benefit themselves.

A person wants to be recognized and responded to not only on the objective level (what she did), but on the subjective too (what she meant in doing it, what motivated her, etc.)

I love your point 1. I love that you recognize that we often do injustice to others in our assumptions about them, even our unconscious assumptions in smallish matters.


Kate Whittaker Cousino

Aug 21, 2016 6:10pm

I was an admin on a FB Catholic Moms group of a mere 4000 or so members, and it is hard to treat every case as an individual person, with the consideration that requires, when there's so much traffic and posts to keep an eye on. :-/ And making distinctions of any subtlety at all is difficult because there are sure to be several hundred members who get upset that you are obviously Playing Favorites. I wound up leaving that position (and the group itself) because of the difficulty of interacting on a truly personal level in a group of so very many people.